Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
COMPARING PITCH PATTERN TESTS BASED ON VOWELS AND TONES
1
School of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, India
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2023-06-17
Final revision date: 2023-11-13
Acceptance date: 2023-11-16
Online publication date: 2023-12-22
Publication date: 2023-12-22
Corresponding author
Anuj Kumar Neupane
School of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Dhankawadi, 411043, Pune, India
School of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Dhankawadi, 411043, Pune, India
J Hear Sci 2023;13(4):27-31
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The pitch pattern test (PPT) is a test of temporal ordering in which a subject needs to correctly repeat a sequence of three auditory stimuli comprised of high and low frequencies. Traditionally, tones are used, but here the aim was to develop a PPT using vowels. The tests were done in young adults and a comparison was made between the two methods.
Material and methods:
The study involved 40 young adults with normal hearing sensitivity and was done in two phases. Phase I involved the development of a PPT using the vowel /a/, and in Phase II the test was administered. A comparison was made with the PPT based on tones. In both tests, stimuli were delivered monaurally.
Results:
All participants were able to do the PPT using either vowels or tones. No ear or gender effects were observed. However, the mean scores for PPT using tones were notably better than those obtained using vowels.
Conclusions:
The present study has developed a PPT using the vowel /a/ and has compared scores with the tonal pitch pattern test. The absence of a ceiling effect in the PPT using a vowel gives it an advantage in terms of potential clinical utility. The strong positive correlation between the PPT using a vowel and the PPT using a tone shows a significant relationship between the two tests in the specific domain of temporal ordering.
The pitch pattern test (PPT) is a test of temporal ordering in which a subject needs to correctly repeat a sequence of three auditory stimuli comprised of high and low frequencies. Traditionally, tones are used, but here the aim was to develop a PPT using vowels. The tests were done in young adults and a comparison was made between the two methods.
Material and methods:
The study involved 40 young adults with normal hearing sensitivity and was done in two phases. Phase I involved the development of a PPT using the vowel /a/, and in Phase II the test was administered. A comparison was made with the PPT based on tones. In both tests, stimuli were delivered monaurally.
Results:
All participants were able to do the PPT using either vowels or tones. No ear or gender effects were observed. However, the mean scores for PPT using tones were notably better than those obtained using vowels.
Conclusions:
The present study has developed a PPT using the vowel /a/ and has compared scores with the tonal pitch pattern test. The absence of a ceiling effect in the PPT using a vowel gives it an advantage in terms of potential clinical utility. The strong positive correlation between the PPT using a vowel and the PPT using a tone shows a significant relationship between the two tests in the specific domain of temporal ordering.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Shinn JB. Temporal processing: the basics. Hear J, 2003; 56(7): 52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.....
2.
Pinheiro ML. Tests of central auditory function in children with learning disabilities. In: Keith RW, editor, Central Auditory Dysfunction. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1977; 223–56.
3.
Musiek FE. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 1994; 5(4): 265–8.
4.
Bellis TJ. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From science to practice. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2011.
5.
Elias KM, Santos MF, Ciasca SM, Moura-Ribeiro MV. Auditory processing in children with cerebrovascular disease. Pro Fono, 2007; 19: 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-....
6.
Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiol, 1987; 26(2): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.3109/002060....
7.
Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML, Wilson DH. Auditory pattern perception in ‘split brain’ patients. Arch Otolaryngol, 1980; 106(10): 610–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/archot....
8.
Balen SA, Moore DR, Sameshima K. Pitch and duration pattern sequence tests in 7- to 11-year-old children: results depend on response mode. J Am Acad Audiol, 2019; 30(1): 6–15. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.1....
9.
Silva RD, Oliveira CM, Cardoso AC. Application of temporal pattern tests in children with persistent developmental stuttering. Rev CEFAC, 2011; 13: 902–8 [in Portuguese]. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-....
10.
Rowe EJ, Cake LJ. Retention of order information for sounds and words. Can J Psychol, 1977; 31(1): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00816....
11.
Jutras B, Gagné JP. Auditory sequential organization among children with and without a hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 1999; 42(3): 553–67. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.....
12.
Koravand A, Jutras B, Roumy N. Peripheral hearing loss and auditory temporal ordering ability in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2010; 74(1): 50–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpo....
13.
Conrad R, Hull AJ. Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. Br J Psychol, 1964; 55(4): 429–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044....
14.
Aaronson D. Temporal factors in perception and short-term memory. Psychol Bull, 1967; 67(2): 130–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00241....
15.
Moore BC, Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson W. Introduction. The perception of speech: from sound to meaning. Philos Trans R Soc B, 2008; 363(1493): 917–21. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2....
16.
Norman DA, Rumelhart DE. A system for perception and memory. In: Norman DA, editor. Models of Human Memory. Elsevier Science; 1970: 19–64.
17.
Tiwari S. Maturational Effect of Pitch Pattern Sequence Test (Dissertation No IP441). Mysore: All India Institute of Speech and Hearing; 2003. Available from: http://203.129.241.86:8080/xml... [Accessed: 10.10.2023].
18.
Vaidyanath R, Yathiraj A. Screening checklist for auditory processing in adults (SCAP-A): development and preliminary findings. J Hear Science, 2014; 4(1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.17430/89078....
19.
Boersma P, Weenink DJM. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.51). Available from: http://www.praat.org/[Accessed: 10.10.2023].
20.
Majak J, Zamysłowska-Szmytke E, Rajkowska E, Śliwińska-Kowalska M. Auditory temporal processing tests: normative data for Polish-speaking adults. Med Pr, 2015; 66(2): 145–52. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.58....
21.
Fink M, Churan J, Wittmann M. Assessment of auditory temporal-order thresholds: a comparison of different measurement procedures and the influences of age and gender. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2005; 23(5–6): 281–96.
22.
Szymaszek A, Szelag E, Sliwowska M. Auditory perception of temporal order in humans: the effect of age, gender, listener practice and stimulus presentation mode. Neurosci Lett, 2006; 403(1–2): 190–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neul....
23.
Lotze M, Wittmann M, von Steinbüchel N, Pöppel E, Roenneberg T. Daily rhythm of temporal resolution in the auditory system. Cortex, 1999; 35(1): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-....
24.
Fuente A, McPherson B. Auditory processing tests for Spanish--speaking adults: an initial study. Int J Audiol, 2006; 45(11): 645–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/149920....
25.
Frederigue-Lopes NB, Bevilacqua MC, Sameshima K, Costa OA. Performance of typical children in free field auditory temporal tests. Pro Fono, 2010; 22: 83–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
