Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
CONTENT VALIDITY OF SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE SPEECH, SPATIAL AND QUALITIES OF HEARING SCALE FOR PARENTS (SSQ-P) AS MEASURED BY A SURVEY OF EXPERT OPINION
1
Audiology Department, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
2
Hearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
3
LICAMM, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2023-05-10
Final revision date: 2023-11-27
Acceptance date: 2023-12-08
Online publication date: 2023-12-22
Publication date: 2023-12-22
Corresponding author
Edward C. Killan
LICAMM, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, LS2 9UT, Leeds, United Kingdom
LICAMM, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, LS2 9UT, Leeds, United Kingdom
J Hear Sci 2023;13(4):32-37
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The purpose of this small-scale study was to assess the content validity of a modified subset of ten items from the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale for Parents (SSQ-P) via a survey of expert opinion.
Material and methods:
An online survey was used to obtain opinions from 10 experts in the field of children’s hearing and hearing assessment. Experts were asked to rate the relevance and representativeness of each SSQ-P item to deaf and hard of hearing children aged 5 years and over. Content validity was assessed by the item content validity index (ICVI), with excellent content validity identified as an ICVI above 0.8. Experts were also asked to suggest where they felt the wording of items could be improved.
Results:
For all items, ICVIs > 0.8 were obtained for both relevance and representativeness, indicating excellent content validity. Some minor rewording suggestions were made.
Conclusions:
The 10 items tested are candidates for inclusion in an abbreviated version of SSQ-P. Some minor rewording of items may be required, along with assessment of internal consistency and test–retest stability.
The purpose of this small-scale study was to assess the content validity of a modified subset of ten items from the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale for Parents (SSQ-P) via a survey of expert opinion.
Material and methods:
An online survey was used to obtain opinions from 10 experts in the field of children’s hearing and hearing assessment. Experts were asked to rate the relevance and representativeness of each SSQ-P item to deaf and hard of hearing children aged 5 years and over. Content validity was assessed by the item content validity index (ICVI), with excellent content validity identified as an ICVI above 0.8. Experts were also asked to suggest where they felt the wording of items could be improved.
Results:
For all items, ICVIs > 0.8 were obtained for both relevance and representativeness, indicating excellent content validity. Some minor rewording suggestions were made.
Conclusions:
The 10 items tested are candidates for inclusion in an abbreviated version of SSQ-P. Some minor rewording of items may be required, along with assessment of internal consistency and test–retest stability.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Stelmachowicz PG. Hearing aid outcome measures for children. J Am Acad Audiol, 1999; 10: 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042....
2.
Arlinger AD. How to assess outcome of hearing aid fitting in children. Scand Audiol, 2001; 30: 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/010503....
3.
Bagatto MP, Moodie ST, Seewald RC, Bartlett DJ, Scollie SD. A critical review of audiological outcome measures for infants and children. Trends Amplif, 2011; 15: 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/108471....
4.
Beechy T. Is speech intelligibility what speech intelligibility tests? J Acoust Soc Am, 2022; 152: 1573–85. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.001....
5.
Griffin AM, Poissant SF, Freyman RL. Speech-in-noise and quality-of-life measures in school-aged children with normal hearing and with unilateral hearing loss. Ear Hear, 2019; 40: 887–904. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.00....
6.
Galvin KL, Noble W. Adaptation of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale for use with children, parents, and teachers. Cochlear Implants Int, 2013; 14: 135–41. https://doi.org/10.1179/175476....
7.
Consortium for Research in Deaf Education (CRIDE). 2021 Report for England: Education provision for deaf children in England in 2020/21. Available at https://www.ndcs.org.uk/media/....
8.
National Deaf Children’s Society (NDCS). Children’s Hearing Services in England (2021). Available at https://www.ndcs.org.uk/media/....
9.
Killan CF, Baxter PD, Killan EC. Face and content validity analysis of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale for Parents (SSQ-P) when used in a clinical service without interviews or week-long observation periods. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020; 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpo....
10.
Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modelling to questionnaire development, evaluation and refinement. Quality Life Res, 2007; 16 (S1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136....
11.
Hafsteinsson LG, Donovan JJ, Breland B. An item response theory examination of two popular goal orientation measures. Educ Psychol Meas, 2007; 67: 719–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316....
12.
Weinhardt JM, Morse BJ, Chimeli J, Fisher J. An item response theory and factor analytic examination of two prominent maximizing tendency scales. Judgm Decis Mak, 2012; 7: 644–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S19302....
13.
Schilling LS, Dixon JK. Knafl KA, Grey M, Ives B, Lynn MR. Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nurs Res, 2007; 56: 361–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR....
14.
Gadsboell J, Tibaek S. Validity of a shoulder-specific quality of life questionnaire, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, for patients with scapula alata. JSES Open Access, 2017; 1: 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jses....
15.
Korhonen J, Axelin A, Grobler G, Lahti M. Content validation of Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) for primary health care workers in South Africa and Zambia: a heterogeneous expert panel method. Glob Health Action, 2019; 12: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/165497...
16.
Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health, 1997; 20: 269–74.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<269::AID-UR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
17.
Polit DF, Beck C, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health, 2007; 30: 459–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20....
18.
Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res, 1986; 35: 382–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/000061....
19.
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health, 2006; 29: 489–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20....
20.
Lalonde K, McCreery RW. Audiovisual enhancement of speech perception in noise by school-age children who are hard of hearing. Ear Hear, 2020; 41: 705–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.00....
21.
Gordon KA, Daien MF, Negandhi J, Blakeman A, Ganek H, Papsin B, Cushing SL. Exposure to spoken communication in children with cochlear implants during the COVID-19 lockdown. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2021; 147: 368–76. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaot....
22.
Lieu JEC. Management of children with unilateral hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2015; 48: 1011–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.....
23.
Walker EA. Evidence-based practices and outcomes for children with mild and unilateral hearing loss. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 2020; 51: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_L....
24.
Hopyan T, Manno FAM, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Sad and happy emotion discrimination in music by children with cochlear implants. Child Neuropsychol, 2016; 22: 366–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/092970....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
