ORIGINAL ARTICLE
NO AFTER-EFFECTS OF COVID-19 INFECTION IN TERMS OF STANDARD AUDIOLOGICAL TESTS
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, India
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2022-11-14
Final revision date: 2023-11-01
Acceptance date: 2023-11-02
Online publication date: 2023-12-22
Publication date: 2023-12-22
Corresponding author
Kumari Apeksha
Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, MG Road, 570004, Mysuru, India
J Hear Sci 2023;13(4):19-26
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), considered to be caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), is an acute respiratory disease which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Previously published reports have shown contradictory findings on the
involvement of the auditory system in individuals infected with COVID-19. The present study aims to assess auditory system functioning in individuals post-COVID-19 infection and compare the results with individuals without COVID-19 infection.
Material and methods:
Participants in this study were 30 individuals who had experienced mild COVID-19 infection and 30 individuals who never had COVID-19. Participants were aged between 18 and 40 years. Testing was done 1 to 6 months after infection, and involved conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry, speech perception in quiet and at different signal-to-noise ratios (SPIN), transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in quiet and in the presence of contralateral noise, and auditory brainstem response (ABR) in the ipsilateral and contralateral mode.
Results:
None of the tests – pure-tone thresholds, speech perception in quiet and in noise, TEOAE with and without contralateral noise, and ABR – showed any significant difference between individuals who never had COVID-19 infection and those who had recovered from the
infection. Both afferent and efferent auditory pathways showed normal findings in individuals post-COVID-19 infection.
Conclusions:
Individuals who have been infected with mild COVID-19 did not show any significant deficit in any of the audiological tests, suggesting that the disease does not cause any permanent harm to the auditory system after the infection has subsided.
REFERENCES (38)
3.
Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol, 2020; 77(6): 683–90.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamane....
4.
Gedik O, Hüsam H, Başöz M, Tas N, Aksoy F. The effect of coronavirus disease 2019 on the hearing system. J Laryngol Otol, 2021; 135(9): 810–4.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S00222....
5.
Basoz M, Tas N, Gedik O, Ozdemir S, Aksoy F. Transient otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression findings in COVID-19 patients. Egypt J Otolaryngol, 2022; 38(1): 43.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163....
6.
Dror AA, Kassis-Karayanni N, Oved A, Daoud A, Eisenbach N, Mizrachi M, et al. Auditory performance in recovered SARS-COV-2 patients. Otol Neurotol, 2021; 42(5): 666–70.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.00....
7.
Durgut O, Karatas M, Celik C, Dikici O, Solmaz F, Gencay S. The effects of SARS-CoV-2 on hearing thresholds in COVID-19 patients with non-hospitalized mild disease. Am J Otolaryngol, 2022; 43(2): 103320.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjo....
8.
Hassani S, Lazem M, Jafari Z. No lasting impact of COVID-19 on the auditory system: a prospective cohort study. J Laryngol Otol, 2021; 135(12): 1063–8.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S00222....
9.
Boboshko MY, Garbaruk ES, Vikhnina SM, et al. The new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) and hearing function in adults. J Otorhinolaryngol Hear Balance Med, 2022; 3(2): 5.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm30....
10.
National Institutes of Health (2021). Clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 Infection, section 43. Available from:
https://files.covid19treatment... [Accessed 10.10.2023].
11.
Carhart R, Jerger JF. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord, 1959; 24(4): 330–45.
https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.2....
12.
Clark JG. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA, 1981; 23: 493–500.
13.
Onusko E. Tympanometry. Am Fam Physician, 2004; 70(9): 1713–20.
14.
Cho S-J, Cho S-H, Choi M-J. Effects of contralateral stimulus on the transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing. Audiol Speech Res, 2006; 2(2): 160–4.
http://doi.org/10.21848/audiol....
15.
Kavitha EM. High Frequency Kannada Speech Identification Test [unpublished Master Dissertation]. University of Mysore; 2002.
16.
Gallus R, Melis A, Rizzo D, Piras A, De Luca LM, Tramaloni P, et al. Audiovestibular symptoms and sequelae in COVID-19 patients. J Vestib Res, 2021; 31(5): 381–7.
https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-20....
17.
Bozdemir K, Çallıoğlu EE, İslamoğlu Y, Ercan MK, Eser F, Özdem B, et al. Evaluation of the effects of COVID-19 on cochleovestibular system with audiovestibular tests. Ear Nose Throat J, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014556....
18.
Dharmarajan S, Bharathi MB, Sivapuram K, Prakash BG, Madhan S, Madhu A, et al. Hearing loss: a camouflaged manifestation of COVID 19 infection. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2021; 73(4): 494–8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070....
19.
Sousa F, Pinto Costa R, Xará S, Nóbrega Pinto A, Almeida e Sousa C. SARS-CoV-2 and hearing: an audiometric analysis of COVID-19 hospitalized patients. J Otol, 2021; 16(3): 158–64. htpps://10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.005.
20.
Fancello V, Hatzopoulos S, Corazzi V, Bianchini Ch, Skarżyńska MB, Pelucchi S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and audio-vestibular disorders. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol, 2021; 35.
https://doi.org/10.1177/205873...
21.
Swain SK, Heinze B. Incidence of hearing loss in COVID-19 patients: a COVID hospital-based study in the eastern part of India. Int J Curr Res Rev, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR....
22.
Yıldız E. Comparison of pure tone audiometry thresholds and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) of patients with and without COVID-19 pneumonia. Am J Otolaryngol, 2022; 43(2): 103377.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjo....
23.
Kilic O, Kalcioglu MT, Cag Y, Tuysuz O, Pektas E, Caskurlu H, et al. Could sudden sensorineural hearing loss be the sole manifestation of COVID-19? An investigation into SARS-COV-2 in the etiology of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Infect Dis, 2020; 97: 208–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid....
25.
Verma H, Shah J, Akhilesh K, Shukla B. Patients’ perspective about speech, swallowing and hearing status post-SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) recovery: e-survey. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol, 2022; 279(5): 2523–32.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405....
26.
Austin DF, Konrad-Martin D, Griest S, McMillan GP, McDermott D, Fausti S. Diabetes-related changes in hearing. Laryngoscope, 2009; 119(9): 1788–96.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.2....
27.
Al-Sofiani M, MacLeod S, Ghanim H, Stecker N, Hall J, Lippes H. Type 1 diabetes and hearing loss: audiometric assessment and measurement of circulating levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2020; 36(6): 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3....
28.
Wang M, Ai Y, Han Y, Fan Z, Shi P, Wang H. Extended high-frequency audiometry in healthy adults with different age groups. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2021; 50(1): 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463....
29.
Kokten N, Celik S, Mutlu A, Pektas E, Icten S, Kalcioglu MT. Does COVID-19 have an impact on hearing? Acta Otolaryngol, 2022; 142(1): 48–51.
https://doi.org/10.1080/000164....
30.
Robinette MS. Clinical observations with evoked otoacoustic emissions at Mayo Clinic. J Am Acad Audiol, 2003; 14(4): 213–24.
31.
Stuart A, Kerls AN. Does contralateral inhibition of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suggest sex or ear laterality effects? Am J Audiol, 2018; 27(3): 272–82. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go... [Accessed: 10.10.2023].
32.
Lisowska G, Namyslowski G, Orecka B, Misiolek M. Influence of aging on medial olivocochlear system function. Clin Interv Aging, 2014; 9: 901–14.
https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_A....
33.
Jedrzejczak WW, Pilka E, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H. Does the presence of spontaneous components affect the reliability of contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions? Ear Hear, 2021; 42(4): 990–1005.
https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.00....
34.
Hatanaka T, Shuto H, Yasuhara A, Kobayashi Y. Ipsilateral and contralateral recordings of auditory brainstem responses to monaural stimulation. Pediatr Neurol, 1988; 4(6): 354–7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-8....
35.
Kato T, Shiraishi K, Imamura A, Kimura KI, Morizono T, Soda T. Analysis of auditory brainstem response waveforms derived ipsilaterally and contralaterally to monaural stimulation. Auris Nasus Larynx, 1995; 22(2): 96–102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0385-....
36.
Kumar P, Pradhan B, Handa D, Sanju HK. Effect of age on time-compressed speech perception and speech perception in noise in normal hearing individuals. J Hear Sci, 2016; 6(1): 33–9.
https://doi.org/10.17430/89697....
37.
Van Zyl M, Hanekom JJ. Speech perception in noise: a comparison between sentence and prosody recognition. J Hear Sci, 2011; 1(2): 54–6.
38.
Smith SB, Krizman J, Liu C, White-Schwoch T, Nicol T, Kraus N. Investigating peripheral sources of speech-in-noise variability in listeners with normal audiograms. Hear Res, 2019; 371: 66–74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hear....