Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
EFFICACY OF SMARTPHONE-BASED SCREENING BY TEACHERS FOR EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF HEARING LOSS IN SCHOOL CHILDREN
1
Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Dharwad, India
2
Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, India
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2024-07-12
Final revision date: 2024-10-11
Acceptance date: 2024-10-22
Online publication date: 2025-03-28
Publication date: 2025-03-28
Corresponding author
Sabarish Appu
Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Shri Shinarathreeshwara Nagara, 580007, Dharwad, India
Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Shri Shinarathreeshwara Nagara, 580007, Dharwad, India
J Hear Sci 2024;14(4):47-52
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The high prevalence of hearing impairment in school children highlights the need for regular school screening programs. However, lack of professionals and infrastructure can create a barrier for screening all children. Smartphones present an opportunity for school teachers to be trained to perform hearing screening among students. The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of smartphone-based hearing screening by school teachers.
Material and methods:
The participants comprised 580 students, from grades 1 through 5 from various schools in Dharwad city. The children were screened by trained school teachers using the smartphone-based app Hearing Test developed by e-audiologia.pl. To test validity, the same children were again tested by a professional audiologist using a diagnostic clinical audiometer.
Results:
The results of the current study found small but significantly higher mean thresholds across frequencies using the Hearing Test app compared to the diagnostic audiometer. However, thresholds obtained using both devices were within normal limits of –10 to 15 dB HL. Hence, it might be possible for the Hearing Test app to be used for hearing screening in primary school children.
Conclusions:
After training, it appears feasible for school teachers to utilize the Hearing Test app to screen for hearing loss in school children. This could make hearing screening more routine and cost-effective, and may aid in the early detection of hearing loss. However, it appears that hearing thresholds established by teachers using the app were slightly worse than those established by an audiologist using an audiometer.
The high prevalence of hearing impairment in school children highlights the need for regular school screening programs. However, lack of professionals and infrastructure can create a barrier for screening all children. Smartphones present an opportunity for school teachers to be trained to perform hearing screening among students. The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of smartphone-based hearing screening by school teachers.
Material and methods:
The participants comprised 580 students, from grades 1 through 5 from various schools in Dharwad city. The children were screened by trained school teachers using the smartphone-based app Hearing Test developed by e-audiologia.pl. To test validity, the same children were again tested by a professional audiologist using a diagnostic clinical audiometer.
Results:
The results of the current study found small but significantly higher mean thresholds across frequencies using the Hearing Test app compared to the diagnostic audiometer. However, thresholds obtained using both devices were within normal limits of –10 to 15 dB HL. Hence, it might be possible for the Hearing Test app to be used for hearing screening in primary school children.
Conclusions:
After training, it appears feasible for school teachers to utilize the Hearing Test app to screen for hearing loss in school children. This could make hearing screening more routine and cost-effective, and may aid in the early detection of hearing loss. However, it appears that hearing thresholds established by teachers using the app were slightly worse than those established by an audiologist using an audiometer.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Netten AP, Rieffe C, Theunissen S, Soede W, Dirks E, Korver AMH, et al. Early identification: language skills and social functioning in deaf and hard of hearing preschool children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2015; 79(12): 2221–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpo....
2.
Stika CJ, Eisenberg LS, Carter AS, Johnson KC, Hammes Ganguly DM, Henning SC, et al. Developmental outcomes in early-identified children who are hard of hearing at 2 to 3 years of age. Ear Hear, 2021; 42(5): 1238–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.00....
3.
Lieu JE. Speech-language and educational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2004; 130(5): 524. https://doi.org/10.1001/archot....
4.
Verma RR, Konkimalla A, Thakar A, Sikka K, Singh AC, Khanna T. Prevalence of hearing loss in India. Natl Med J India, 2021; 34(4): 216–22. https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_....
5.
Konadath S, Suma C, Jayaram G, Sandeep, M, Mahima G, Shreyank P. Prevalence of communication disorders in a rural population of India. J Hear Sci, 2013; 3(2): 41–9. https://doi.org/10.17430/88900....
6.
Jijo PM, Sreeraj K, Sandhya K, Preethi M, Rashmi P. Prevalence and causes of communication disorders: a retrospective study from northern Karnataka, Clin Epidemiol Glob Health, 2020; 8(1): 138–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh....
7.
Le Clercq CMP, van Ingen G, Ruytjens L, Goedegebure A, Moll HA, Raat H, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss among children 9 to 11 years old: the generation R study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017; 143(9): 928–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaot....
8.
Skarżyński H, Gos E, Świerniak W, Skarżyński PH. Prevalence of hearing loss among Polish school-age children from rural areas: results of hearing screening program in the sample of 67 416 children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020; 128: 109676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpo....
9.
Skarżyński PH, Świerniak W, Gos E, Gocel M, Skarżyński H. Organizational aspects and outcomes of a hearing screening program among first-grade children in the Mazovian region of Poland. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 2021; 52(3): 856–67. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_L....
10.
Hurley A, Willis M, Guidry M, Bode D, Corneille ML, Mills S. A program review of Head Start and elementary school hearing screenings. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 2020; 51(2): 345–52. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_L....
11.
Pilka E, Jedrzejczak WW, Kochanek K, Pastucha M, Skarzynski H. Assessment of the hearing status of school-age children from rural and urban areas of mid-eastern Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021; 18(8): 4299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
12.
Kam AC, Sung JK, Lee T, Wong TK, Van Hasselt A. Clinical evaluation of a computerized self-administered hearing test. Int J Audiol, 2012; 51(8): 606–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/149920....
13.
Melo IMM, Silva ARX, Camargo R, Cavalcanti HG, Ferrari DV, Taveira KVM, et al. Accuracy of smartphone-based hearing screening tests: a systematic review. Codas, 2022; 34(3): e20200380. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1....
14.
De Sousa KC, Swanepoel W, Moore DR, Smits C. A smartphone national hearing test: performance and characteristics of users. Am J Audiol, 2018; 27(3S): 448–54. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_A....
15.
Masalski M, Grysiński T, Kręcicki T. Hearing tests based on biologically calibrated mobile devices: comparison with pure-tone audiometry. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2018; 6(1): e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealt....
16.
Louw C, Swanepoel W, Eikelboom R H, Myburgh HC. Smartphone-based hearing screening at primary health care clinics. Ear Hear, 2017; 38(2): 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.00....
17.
Sandström J, Swanepoel D, Laurent C, Umefjord G, Lundberg T. Accuracy and reliability of smartphone self-test audiometry in community clinics in low income settings: a comparative study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2020; 129(6): 578–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348....
18.
Mahomed-Asmail F, Swanepoel de W, Eikelboom RH, Myburgh HC, Hall J. Clinical validity of hearScreen™ smartphone hearing screening for school children. Ear Hear, 2016; 37(1): e11–e17. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.00....
19.
Renda L, Selcuk OT, Eyigor H, Osma U, Yilmaz MD. Smartphone based audiometric test for confirming the level of hearing: is it useable in underserved areas? J Int Adv Otol, 2016; 12(1): 61–6. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.20....
20.
Corona A P, Ferrite S, Bright T, Polack S. Validity of hearing screening using hearTest smartphone-based audiometry: performance evaluation of different response modes. Int J Audiol, 2020; 59(9): 666–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/149920....
21.
Murphy MP, Gates GA. Hearing loss: does gender play a role? Medscape Womens Health, 1997; 2(10): 2.
22.
Sharashenidze N, Schacht J, Kevanishvili Z. Age-related hearing loss: gender differences. Georgian Med News, 2007; 144: 14–18.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
