HYPOTHESIS PAPER
THE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MODEL FOR HYPERACUSIS AND MISOPHONIA
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Otolaryngology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
2
Jastreboff Hearing Disorders Foundation, Inc., Guilford, CT, USA
These authors had equal contribution to this work
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2025-05-05
Final revision date: 2025-07-25
Acceptance date: 2025-09-23
Online publication date: 2025-12-19
Publication date: 2025-12-19
Corresponding author
Pawel J. Jastreboff
Department of Otolaryngology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, 1639 Pierce Dr NE, GA 30322, Atlanta, United States
J Hear Sci 2025;1(SPECIAL ISSUE ON MISOPHONIA AND HYPERACUSIS 1):58-63
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Tinnitus patients frequently complain about Decreased Sound Tolerance (DST) as well. Based on the observations of several hundred patients with Decreased Sound Tolerance the existence of unrecognized earlier auditory disorder with distinctive and different from hyperacusis characteristics has been identified. Patients with this disorder exhibited negative emotional and autonomic reactions evoked by a specific for a given patient patterns of sound. Consequently, the name misophonia for this previously not described disorder and its definition based on data gathered from our patients was proposed in 2001. It is possible to have tinnitus, hyperacusis, and misophonia in combination or as isolated conditions. On the basis of analysis of characteristic features of patients with DST, and general neuroscience, the neurophysiological model for both misophonia and hyperacusis has been proposed. The key characteristic of misophonia is the formation of inappropriate, pattern-specific, subconscious connections, between the auditory system and other systems of the brain, governed by the principles of conditioned reflexes. Notably, the brain systems and connections involved in misophonia are the same as in the case of tinnitus. The mechanism of hyperacusis is based on abnormally increased gain within the subconscious part of the auditory pathways. This yields a high level of neuronal activity, equivalent to activity evoked by a much stronger sound in normal subjects. The activation of the other systems in the brain is a consequence of spreading this abnormally enhanced sound-evoked activity by normally functioning neuronal connections from the auditory to other systems in the brain. In misophonia, sound-evoked signals within the auditory pathways are normal, but development of incorrect pattern-specific connections yield abnormally strong activations of various systems in the brain. In hyperacusis and misophonia reactions evoked by bothersome sound are very similar, even identical and cannot be used to differentiate these two disorders. Importantly, both clinical observations and predictions of the model point out that misophonia requires a different approach for diagnosis and treatment than hyperacusis.
FUNDING
This research and article did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff MM. The neurophysiological approach to misophonia: theory and treatment. Front Neurosci, 2023; 17: 895574.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.....
4.
Swedo SE, Baguley DM, Denys D, Dixon LJ, Erfanian M, Fioretti A, et al. Consensus definition of misophonia: a Delphi study. Front Neurosci, 2022; 16: 841816.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.....
5.
Brout JJ. Thinking about the consensus definition of misophonia. How does it affect those with misophonia? Psychology Today, 2022: 8. Available from:
https://www.psychologytoday.co... [Accessed 20.03.2025].
7.
Neacsiu AD, Szymkiewicz V, Galla JT, Li B, Kulkarni Y, Spector CW. The neurobiology of misophonia and implications for novel, neuroscience-driven interventions. Front Neurosci, 2022; 16: 893903.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.....
8.
Kumar S, Tansley-Hancock O, Sedley W, Winston JS, Callaghan MF, Allen M, et al. The brain basis for misophonia. Curr Biol, 2017; 27(4): 527–33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.....
9.
Jastreboff MM, Jastreboff PJ. Decreased sound tolerance and Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT). Aust N Z J Audiol, 2002; 21(2): 74–81.
https://doi.org/10.1375/audi.2....
10.
Jastreboff MM, Jastreboff PJ. Diagnosis and treatment of misophonia and hyperacusis based on the neurophysiological model. J Hear Sci, 2025; 15 (Special Issue): 64-69.
https://doi.org/10.17430/jhs/2...
11.
Jastreboff MM, Jastreboff PJ. Evidence of successful treatment and potential cure in misophonia using Tinnitus Retraining Therapy protocols. Tinnitus Research Initiative Conference 2025 (TRI 2025), 18.05.2025, Seoul, Korea.
14.
Bowie MJ. Understanding ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS: a worktext. 10th ed. Mason: Cengage Learning; 2025.
16.
ICD-11 International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision. Available from:
https://icd.who.int/en/ [Accessed 10.05.2025].
17.
Storch EA, Guzick AG, D’Souza J, Clinger J, Ayton D, Kook M, et al. Family accommodation in children and adolescents with misophonia. Behav Ther, 2024; 55(3): 595–604.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth....