ORIGINAL ARTICLE
SENSE OF COHERENCE AND TINNITUS ANNOYANCE IN ADULTS
Justyna Paluchowska 1, A-B,D-F
,
 
,
 
,
 
Elżbieta Gos 3, C-D
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Rehabilitation Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
 
2
Tinnitus Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
 
3
Teleaudiology and Screening Department, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
 
4
Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Surgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
 
 
Publication date: 2021-08-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Justyna Paluchowska   

Rehabilitation Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17, Kajetany 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland
 
 
J Hear Sci 2021;11(2):52-58
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Tinnitus is usually a chronic (ongoing) condition which in many cases significantly impairs the affected person’s quality of life. Their habituation to tinnitus depends on the patient’s personality resources. The aim of this research was to determine if a particular psychological meta-resource, in this case a sense of coherence, is related to the perceived annoyance of tinnitus.

Material and methods:
The study included 176 people (123 females, 53 males) aged 31–80 (M = 59.1) diagnosed with tinnitus. To measure the sense of coherence, we used the Sense of Coherence Questionnaire (SOC 29), and to evaluate the tinnitus annoyance, we used the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). The subjects also filled in a survey to capture sociodemographic data and their medical history.

Results:
The sense of coherence (in total and in particular aspects) turned out to be significantly correlated with tinnitus annoyance (in total and in particular aspects). The overall level of coherence turned out to be an essential predictor for the overall level of tinnitus annoyance. The degree of manageability was a particularly important component of the sense of coherence which affected tinnitus annoyance.

Conclusions:
In people with a strong sense of coherence, especially with a strong manageability component, there is a lower level of tinnitus annoyance. Psychological interventions – counselling, psychoeducation, psychotherapy – support the development of a sense of coherence and can reduce tinnitus annoyance.

 
REFERENCES (38)
1.
Kirenko J, Byra S. Personal Resources in Psychosomatic Diseases. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej; 2008; 75–107.
 
2.
Antonovsky A. Unraveling the Mystery of Health. How people manage stress and stay well. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychiatrii i Neurologii; 2005.
 
3.
Pruszewicz A. Clinical Audiology: Outline. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Akademii Medycznej im. Karola Marcinkowskiego; 2003.
 
4.
Henry JL, Wilson PH. Coping with tinnitus: two studies of psychological and audiological characterstics of patients with high and low tinnitus-related distress. Int Tinnitus J, 1995; 1: 85–92. 5. Sarnicka I, Fludra M, Latkowska E, Borawska B, Karpiesz L,.
 
5.
Bartnik G, Skarżyński H. Charakterystyka psychologiczna pacjentów z szumami usznymi na podstawie inwentarza osobowości oraz wybranych narzędzi pomiaru w psychologii zdrowia. n: Janowski K, Cudo A, editors. Człowiek Chory: Aspekty Biopsychospołeczne. Lublin: Best Print; 2009, 115–24.
 
6.
Simões J, Schlee W, Schecklmann M. et al. Big five personality traits are associated with tinnitus improvement over time. Sci Rep, 2019; 9: 18234.
 
7.
Andersson G, Vretblad P. Anxiety sensitivity in patients with chronic tinnitus. Scand J Behaviour Ther, 2000; 29(2): 57–64.
 
8.
Hu J, Xu J, Streelman M, Xu H, Guthrie O. The correlation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory with depression and anxiety in veterans with tinnitus. Int J Otolaryngol, 2015; 2015:689375.
 
9.
Yuri L, Taehwa K, Kieun L, Seungik J, Sungmin J, In-Ki J. The pathophysiology of tinnitus: involvement of the somatosensory, brain, and limbic systems. Audiol Speech Res, 2020; 16(1): 11–18.
 
10.
Andersson G, McKenna L. The role of cognition in tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh.) 2006; suppl. 126: 39–43.
 
11.
Tegg-Quinn S, Bennett RJ, Eikelboom RH, Baguley DM. The impact of tinnitus upon cognition in adults: a systematic review. Int J Audiol, 2016; 55(10): 533-40.
 
12.
Kotyło P, Macheta K, Śliwińska-Kowalska M. Tinnitus annoyance and general health condition in patients with tinnitus before and after short-term tinnitus retraining therapy. Otolaryngol Pol, 2009; 8(1): 23–7.
 
13.
Salazar JW, Meisel K, Smith ER, Quiggle A, McCoy DB, Amans MR. Depression in patients with tinnitus: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019; 161(1), 28–35.
 
14.
Pinto PC, Marcelos CM, Mezzasalma MA, Osterne FJ, de Melo Tavares de Lima MA, Nardi AE. Tinnitus and its association with psychiatric disorders: systematic review. J Laryngol Otol, 2014; 128(8): 660–4.
 
15.
Koning HM. Sleep disturbances associated with tinnitus: reduce the maximal intensity of tinnitus. Int Tinnitus J, 2019; 23(1): 64–8.
 
16.
Crönlein T, Langguth B, Pregler M, Kreuzer PM, Wetter TC, Schecklmann M. Insomnia in patients with chronic tinnitus: cognitive and emotional distress as moderator variables. J Psychosom Res, 2016; 83: 65–8.
 
17.
Mazurek B. Tinnitus: new challenge and therapeutic approaches. HNO, 2018; 66(2): 47–8.
 
18.
Sęk H. Introduction to Clinical Psychology. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar; 2001.
 
19.
Kulik L, Kronfeld M. Adjustment to breast cancer: the contribution of resources and causal attributions regarding the illness. Social Work in Health Care, 2005; 41(2), 37–57.
 
20.
Pusswald G, Fleck M, Lehrner J, Haubenberger D, Weber G, Auff E. The “Sense of Coherence” and the coping capacity of patients with Parkinson disease. Int Psychogeriatr, 2012 Dec; 24(12): 1972–9.
 
21.
Nahlén C, Saboonchi F. Coping, sense of coherence and the dimensions of affect in patients with chronic heart failure. Euro J Cardiovascular Nursing, 2010; 9(2), 118–25.
 
22.
Müller J, Hess J, Hager A. Sense of coherence, rather than exercise capacity, is the stronger predictor to obtain health-related quality of life in adults with congenital heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2013; 21: 949–55.
 
23.
Włodarczyk D, Wrześniewski K. Stress appraisal in terms of challenge in MI patients: an attempt in synthesis based on empirical data. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 2005; 48, 339–59.
 
24.
Seydel C, Haupt H, Olze H, Szczepek AJ, Mazurek B. Gender and chronic tinnitus: differences in tinnitus-related distress depend on age and duration of tinnitus. Ear Hear, 2013; 34(5): 661–72.
 
25.
Koniarek J, Dudek B, Makowska Z. The Sense of Coherence Questionnaire. Adaptation of the A. Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Questionnaire (SOC). Przegląd Psychologiczny, 1993; 36, 491–502.
 
26.
Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolayrngol Head Neck Surg, 1996; 122: 143–8.
 
27.
Skarżyński PH, Raj-Koziak D, Rajchel J, Piłka A, Włodarczyk A, Skarżyński H. Adaptation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory into Polish and its testing on clinical population of tinnitus sufferers. Int J Audiol, 2017; 24: 1–5.
 
28.
Fludra M, Kobosko J, Gos E, Karendys-Łuszcz K, Skarżyński H. Role of personal resources from the perspective of experiencing tinnitus annoyance in adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2020; 277, 1617–23.
 
29.
Pasikowski T. Sense of Coherence Questionnaire for adults (SOC-29). In: Sęk H, Pasikowski T. ed. Health – Stress – Resources: The importance of a sense of coherence for health. Poznań: Fundacja Humaniora; 2001,71–85.
 
30.
Eriksson M, Lindström B. Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2005; 59(6): 460–6.
 
31.
Eriksson M, Lindström B. Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review. J Epidemiology Community Health, 2006; 60: 376–81.
 
32.
Kaczmarek Ł. The association between the sense of coherence and positive affect depend on the levels of stress. In: Sęk H, Pasikowski T. ed. Health Psychology: Theory, methodology, empirics. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe; 2006.
 
33.
Mroziak B. Sense of coherence (SOC) of alcohol addicts: changes after psychotherapy. In: Sęk H, Pasikowski T. ed. Health – Stress – Resources: The importance of a sense of coherence for health. Poznań: Wydaw. Fundacji Humaniora; 2001, 165–76.
 
34.
Lundqvist T. Specific thought patterns in chronic cannabis smokers observed during treatment. Life Sci, 1995; 56(23-24): 2141–4.
 
35.
Szymona, K. Changes of sense of coherence (SOC) after psychotherapy in neurotic patients. Psychiatria Polska, 2005; 39(4), 659–68.
 
36.
Weissbecker I, Salmon P, Studts JL et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and sense of coherence among women with fibromyalgia. J Clin Psychol Med Settings, 2002; 9: 297–307.
 
37.
Rademaker MM, Stegeman I, Ho-Kang-You KE, Stokroos RJ, Smit AL. The effect of mindfulness-based interventions on tinnitus distress: a systematic review. Front Neurol, 2019; 10: 1135.
 
38.
Hourzad A, Pouladi S, Ostovar A, Ravanipour M. The effects of an empowering self-management model on self-efficacy and sense of coherence among retired elderly with chronic diseases: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging, 2018; 13: 2215–24.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top