REVIEW PAPER
A REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF WIRELESS SYNCHRONIZED HEARING AIDS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Chinnaraj Geetha   

Chinnaraj Geetha, Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India, e-mail: geethamysore.cs@gmail.com
Publication date: 2020-04-15
 
J Hear Sci 2015;5(4):9–12
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Some paired digital hearing aids use wireless technology to communicate with each other and generate improved binaural information. Coordination between the two ears makes it easier for the brain to identify sound sources and understand speech even in complex environments. How well does this technology work. This article gives an evidence-based review.
 
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Dillon H. Binaural and bilateral considerations in hearing aid fitting. In: Hearing aids. New York, 2001; 370–403.
 
2.
Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 1978; 63: 533–49.
 
3.
Hamacher V, Chalupper J, Eggers J, Fischer E, Kornagel U, Puder H et al. Signal processing in high-end hearing aids: state of the art, challenges, and future trends. EURASIP, J Appl Sig Process, 2005; 2915–29.
 
4.
Bretoli S, Bodmer D, Probst R. Survey on hearing aid outcome in Switzerland: associations with type of fitting (bilateral/unilateral), level of hearing aid signal processing and hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 2010; 49: 333–46.
 
5.
Wightman FL, Kistler DJ. Factors affecting the relative salience of sound localization cues. In: Gilkey RH, Anderson, TR, eds. Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997; 1–23.
 
6.
Boymans M, Goverts ST, Kramer SE, Festen JM, Dreschler WA. Candidacy for bilateral hearing aids: a retrospective multicenter study. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2009, 52(1): 130–40.
 
7.
Marketrak SK. 25-year trends in the hearing health market. Hear Rev, 2009; 16: 12–31.
 
8.
Hawley ML, Litovsky RY, Colburn HS. Speech intelligibility and localization in complex environments. J Acoust Soc Am, 1999; 105: 3436–48.
 
9.
Keidser G, Rohrseitz K, Dillon H, Hamacher V, Carter L, Rass U et al. The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers. Int J Audiol, 2006; 45: 563–79.
 
10.
Kreisman BM, Mazevski AG, Schum DJ, Sockalingam R. Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Trends Amplif, 2010; 14(1): 3–11.
 
11.
Schum DJ. Communication between hearing aids. Advances for Audiologists, 2010; 10: 44–9.
 
12.
Cox RM. Evidence-based practice as a provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol, 2005; 16(7): 419–38.
 
13.
Sockalingam R, Holmberg M, Eneroth K, Shulte M. Binaural hearing aid communication shown to improve sound quality and localization. Hear J, 2009; 62: 46–7.
 
14.
Iman I, Vijay P, Ewan M, Margaret C. Evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound localization abilities with hearing aids using binaural wireless technology. Audiol Res, 2013; 3(1): e1.
 
15.
Ciorba A, Loroni G, Prosser S, Zattara S. Quantitative enhancement of speech in noise through a wireless equipped hearing aid. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2014; 34: 50–3.
 
16.
Ricketts T, Henry P, Hornsby BW. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields. Ear Hear, 2005; 26(5): 473–86.