Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in
CASE STUDY
SINGLE TO MULTI-CHANNEL COCHLEAR REIMPLANTATION
AFTER 21 YEARS: CASE REPORT
1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
2
Department of Hearing, Speech and Voice Disorders, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
Publication date: 2012-12-31
Corresponding author
Georg Sprinzl
Georg Sprinzl, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria, e-mail: georg.sprinzl@i-med.ac.at
Georg Sprinzl, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria, e-mail: georg.sprinzl@i-med.ac.at
J Hear Sci 2012;2(4):29–33
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
In the literature cochlear reimplantation is described as a possible surgical procedure and the change from a single to a multichannel device is associated with audiological improvement.
Material and Methods:
A 47 year old male caucasian patient presented after cochlear implantation 21 years ago. Lacking any benefit from the old single-channel implant over the last few years, the patient no longer used the device. The old cochlear implant was changed for a modern multichannel unit.
Results:
The patient showed a great improvement in hearing threshold and his quality of life with the new device.
Conclusions:
This case justifies the reimplantation of patients who have been implanted more than 20 years ago.
In the literature cochlear reimplantation is described as a possible surgical procedure and the change from a single to a multichannel device is associated with audiological improvement.
Material and Methods:
A 47 year old male caucasian patient presented after cochlear implantation 21 years ago. Lacking any benefit from the old single-channel implant over the last few years, the patient no longer used the device. The old cochlear implant was changed for a modern multichannel unit.
Results:
The patient showed a great improvement in hearing threshold and his quality of life with the new device.
Conclusions:
This case justifies the reimplantation of patients who have been implanted more than 20 years ago.
REFERENCES (16)
2.
Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Lowder MW et al: Single-channel to multichannel conversions in adult cochlear implant subjects. Am J Otol, 1998; 19: 461–66.
3.
Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Adunka O et al: Audiological performance with cochlear reimplantation from analogue single-channel implants to digital multi-channel devices. Audiology, 2000; 39: 305–10.
4.
Hochmair-Desoyer I, Burian K: Reimplantation of a molded scala tympani electrode: impact on psychophysical and speech discrimination abilities. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1985; 94: 65–70.
5.
Gantz BJ, Lowder MW, McCabe BF: Audiologic results following reimplantation of cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 1989; 142: 12–16.
6.
Alexiades G, Roland JT Jr, Fishman AJ et al: Cochlear reimplantation: surgical techniques and functional results. Laryngoscope, 2001; 111: 1608–13.
7.
Cote M, Ferron P, Bergeron F et al: Cochlear reimplantation: causes of failure, outcomes, and audiologic performance. Laryngoscope, 2007; 117: 1225–35.
8.
Henson AM, Slattery WH, Luxford WM et al: Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study. Am J Otol, 1999; 20: 56–64.
9.
Sorrentino T, Cote M, Eter E et al: Cochlear reimplantations: technical and surgical failures. Acta Otolaryngol, 2009; 129: 380–84.
10.
Orus DC, Venegas Pizarro MP, De Juan BJ et al: [Cochlear reimplantation in the same ear: Findings, peculiarities of the surgical technique and complications]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 2010; 61: 106–17.
11.
Jackler RK, Leake PA, McKerrow WS: Cochlear implant revision: effects of reimplantation on the cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1989; 98: 813–20.
12.
Greenberg AB, Myers MW, Hartshorn DO et al: Cochlear electrode reimplantation in the guinea pig. Hear Res, 1992; 61: 19–23.
13.
Trotter MI, Backhouse S, Wagstaff S et al: Classification of cochlear implant failures and explantation: the Melbourne experience, 1982-2006. Cochlear Implants Int, 2009; 10(Suppl.1): 105–10.
14.
Yu LS, Chen F, Zheng HW et al: [Cochlear reimplantation]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi, 2004; 39: 598–601.
15.
Woolford TJ, Saeed SR, Boyd P et al: Cochlear reimplantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 1995; 166: 449–53.
16.
Saeed SR, Ramsden RT, Hartley C et al: Cochlear reimplantation. J Laryngol Otol, 1995; 109: 980–85.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.