ORIGINAL ARTICLE
FREQUENCY FOLLOWING RESPONSES IN YOUNG, MIDDLE, AND LATE ADULTHOOD
NITHIN A.K. 1, A-F
,
 
Sinju P.K. 2, B,E
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department 0f Audiology & Speech Language Pathology, Mar Thoma college of special Education, India
 
2
Audiology and speech Language pathology, mar thoma college, India
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
 
 
Publication date: 2021-12-03
 
 
Corresponding author
NITHIN A.K.   

Department 0f Audiology & Speech Language Pathology, Mar Thoma college of special Education, badiadka, 671551, kasaragod, India
 
 
J Hear Sci 2021;11(3):43-50
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Previous work using speech evoked ABR reported a significant decline in onset and offset responses with advancing age, but no differences for Frequency Following Responses (FFRs). Many researchers report reduced neural synchrony as age advances. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of aging on FFRs.

Material and methods:
A total of 45 participants were included in the study. They were divided into three groups of 15 individuals: young adults (20–40 years), middle aged adults (41–60 years), and older adults (>60 years). All had normal hearing sensitivity and were free from any otologic or neurologic disorder. FFRs were obtained using a /da/ stimulus of 40 ms and 80 dBnHL containing five formants. To minimize preferential recording of activity from either side, a midline electrode site was used. Data analysis followed Russo et al. [1]. The seven peaks of the response to /da/ (waves V, A, C, D, E, F, O) were identified by two experienced audiologists as onset responses, spectro-temporal responses, fundamental frequency, and harmonics.

Results:
Findings were that the occurrence of waves V and A was 100% in all individuals, but the occurrence of waves C and O was 60% in young adults, 73% in middle age adults, and 53% in older adults.

Conclusions:
These findings suggest that older listeners have a general reduction in synchronous neural firing to speech stimuli. In particular, the ability of neurons in the auditory system to accurately encode important temporal features of speech may in older adults be limited by impaired neural synchrony, slowed neural conduction time, reduced phase locking ability, or other mechanisms.

REFERENCES (23)
1.
Russo N, Nicol T, Musacchia G, Kraus N. Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol, 2004; 115: 2021–30.
 
2.
Willott JF. Aging and the Auditory System. San Diego: Singular Publishing, 1991.
 
3.
Worden FG, Marsh JT. Frequency-following (microphonic-like) neural responses evoked by sound. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1968; 25(1): 42–52.
 
4.
Galbraith G, Arbagey P, Branski R, Comerci N, Rector P. Intelligible speech encoded in the human brain stem frequency-following response. Neuropsychologia, 1995; 6: 2363–7.
 
5.
Krishnan A. Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels. Hear Res, 2002; 166, 192–201.
 
6.
Marsh JT, Worden FG. Sound evoked frequency following responses in the central auditory pathway. Laryngoscope, 1968; 78: 1149–63.
 
7.
Sohmer H, Pratt H. Identification and separation of acoustic frequency following responses (FFRs) in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1977; 42(4): 493–500.
 
8.
Kraus N, Nicol T. Brainstem origins for cortical ‘what’ and ‘where’ pathways in the auditory system. Trends Neurosci, 2005; 28, 176–181.
 
9.
Clinard CG, Tremblay KL, Krishnan AR. Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings. Hear Res, 2010; 264: 48–55.
 
10.
Vander-Werff RK, Burns KS. Brainstem responses to speech in younger or older adults. Ear Hear, 2011; 32(2), 168–80.
 
11.
Kaplan HI, Sadock VA. Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/ clinical psychiatry (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2007.
 
12.
Carhart R, Jerger JF. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disorders, 1959; 24: 330–45.
 
13.
Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N. Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems. Biol Psychol, 2004; 67(3), 299–317.
 
14.
Dhar S, Abel R, Hornickel J, Nicol T, Skoe E, Zhao W, Kraus N. Exploring the relationship between physiological measures of cochlear and brainstem function. Clin Neurophysiol, 2009;120: 959–66.
 
15.
Sanfins M, Colella-Santos M. A review of the clinical applicability of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. J Health Sci, 2016; 6(1): 9–16.
 
16.
Elliott LL, Hammer MA, Scholl ME, Wasowicz JM. Age differences in discrimination of simulated single-formant frequency transitions. Percept Psychophys, 1989; 46(2): 181–6.
 
17.
Brinkmann RD, Scherg M. Human auditory on-off potentials of the brainstem. Scand Audiol, 1979; 8: 27–32.
 
18.
Van Campen LE, Hall JW, Grantham DW. Human offset auditory brainstem response: effects of stimulus acoustic ringing and rise–fall time. Hear Res, 1997; 103: 35–46.
 
19.
Johnson KL, Nicol TG, Zecker SG et al. Auditory brainstem correlates of perceptual timing deficits. J Cog Neurosci, 2007; 19: 376–85.
 
20.
Hatzopoulos S, Ciorba A, Skarzynski PH (eds.). The Human Auditory System: Basic features and updates on audiological diagnosis and therapy. Intech Open, 2020.
 
21.
Mills JH, Schmeidt RA, Schulte BA, Dubno JR. Age-related hearing loss: a loss of voltage, not hair cells. Semin Hear, 2006; 27: 228–36.
 
22.
Caspary DM, Schatteman TA, Hughes LF. Age-related changes in the inhibitory response properties of dorsal cochlear nucleus output neurons: role of inhibitory inputs. J Neurosci, 2005; 25(47): 10952–9.
 
23.
Frisina RD. Subcortical neural coding mechanisms for auditory temporal processing. Hear Res, 2001; 158: 1–27.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top