More details
Hide details
Business Unit Vibrant, MED-EL Medical Electronics, Austria
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Publication date: 2021-03-31
Corresponding author
Karin Rose-Eichberger   

Business Unit Vibrant, MED-EL Medical Electronics, Fürstenweg 77a, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria
J Hear Sci 2021;11(1):9-20
The Vibrant Soundbridge is a semi-implantable “direct drive” hearing system for the treatment of hearing loss. People who are unsuccessful users of acoustic hearing aids or who are dissatisfied with their hearing aids have been successfully fitted with the device. The Vibrant Soundbridge is comprised of an external audio processor and an internal vibrating ossicular prosthesis, which together convert environmental sound into a vibratory signal delivered to the inner ear. This unique middle ear implant system has, over the past 25 years, proven to be an effective solution for many types of hearing loss – mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss, as well as for conductive or mixed hearing loss. This review gives an overview of the design and development of the system, with a focus on its biomechanics, over the last 25 years.
Miltimore AE. Magneto-telephone for personal wear. 1892. Available from
Berger KW. The hearing aid: its operation and development. 3rd Edition. Livonia, MI: National Hearing Aid Society; 1984.
Wilska A. Eine Methode zur Bestimmung der Hörschwellenamplituden des Trommelfells bei verschiedenen Frequenzen. Skand Arch Für Physiol, 1935 Jul 1; 72: 161–5.
Glorig A, Moushegian G, Bringewald PR, Rupert AL, Gerken GM. Magnetically coupled stimulation of the ossicular chain: measures in kangaroo rat and man. J Acoust Soc Am, 1972 Aug 1; 52: 694–6.
Goode RL, Rosenbaum ML, Maniglia AJ. The history and development of the implantable hearing aid. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 1995 Feb; 28: 1–16.
Békésy G v, Wever EG. Experiments in Hearing. New York: Mc- Graw-Hill; 1960.Peake WT. ‘Experiments in Hearing’ by Georg von Békésy [review]. J Acoust Soc Am, 1990 Dec 1; 88: 2905–6.
Heide J, Tatge G, Sander T, Gooch T, Prescott T. Development of a semi-implantable hearing device. Adv Audiol, 1988; 4: 32–43.
Maniglia AJ, Ko WH, Zhang RX, Dolgin SR, Rosenbaum ML, Montague FW. Electromagnetic implantable middle ear hearing device of the ossicular-stimulating type: principles, designs, and experiments. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 1988 Dec; 136: 3–16.
Hough J, Vernon J, Himelick T, Meikel M, Richard G, Dormer K. A middle ear implantable hearing device for controlled amplification of sound in the human: a preliminary report. Laryngoscope, 1987 Feb; 97: 141–51.
Maniglia AJ, Ko WH, Rosenbaum M, et al. A contactless electromagnetic implantable middle ear device for sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Nose Throat J, 1994 Feb; 73: 78–82, 84–8, 90.
Kartush JM, Tos M. Electromagnetic ossicular augmentation device. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 1995 Feb; 28: 155–72.
Spindel JH, Lambert PR, Ruth RA. The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 1995 Feb; 28: 189–205.
Perkins R. Earlens tympanic contact transducer: a new method of sound transduction to the human ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1996 Jun; 114: 720–8.
Yanagihara N, et al: Efficacy of the partially implantable middle ear implant in the middle and inner ear disorders. Adv Audiol, 1988; 4: 149–59.
Zenner HP, Leysieffer H. [Active electronic hearing implants for middle and inner ear hearing loss – a new era in ear surgery. II: Current state of developments]. HNO, 1997 Oct; 45: 758–68.
Yanagihara N, Suzuki J, Gyo K, Syono H, Ikeda H. Development of an implantable hearing aid using a piezoelectric vibrator of bimorph design: state of the art. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1984 Dec; 92: 706–12.
Ball GR, Huber A, Goode RL. Scanning laser Doppler vibrometry of the middle ear ossicles. Ear Nose Throat J, 1997 Apr; 76: 213–8, 220, 222.
Hong E-P, Park I-Y, Seong K-W, Cho J-H. Evaluation of an implantable piezoelectric floating mass transducer for sensorineural hearing loss. Mechatronics, 2009 Sep; 19: 965–71.
Goode RL, Ball G, Nishihara S. Measurement of umbo vibration in human subjects: method and possible clinical applications. Am J Otol, 1993 May; 14(3): 247–51.
Haynes DS, Young JA, Wanna GB, Glasscock ME. Middle ear implantable hearing devices: an overview. Trends Amplif, 2009 Sep 1; 13: 206–14.
Fröhlich L, Plontke SK, Rahne T. A quantitative approach for the objective assessment of coupling efficiency for an active middle ear implant by recording auditory steady-state responses. Otol Neurotol, 2020 Aug; 41: e906–11.
Kließ MK, Ernst A, Wagner J, Mittmann P. The development of active middle ear implants: a historical perspective and clinical outcomes. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 2018 Oct; 3: 394–404.
Burian A, Gerlinger I, Toth T, Piski Z, Rath G, Bako P. Stapedotomy with incus vibroplasty: a novel surgical solution of advanced otosclerosis and its place among existing therapeutic modalities – Hungarian single institutional experiences. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2020 Feb; 47: 55–64.
Hempel J-M, Sprinzl G, Riechelmann H, et al. A transcutaneous active middle ear implant (AMEI) in children and adolescents: long-term, multicenter results. Otol Neurotol, 2019; 40: 1059–67.
Zahnert T, Mlynski R, Löwenheim H, et al. Long-term outcomes of vibroplasty coupler implantations to treat mixed/conductive hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol, 2018; 23: 316–25.
Iwasaki S, Usami S-I, Takahashi H, et al. Round window application of an active middle ear implant: a comparison with hearing aid usage in Japan. Otol Neurotol, 2017; 38: e145–51.
Suzuki J, Kodera K, Yanagihara N. Middle ear implant for humans. Acta Otolaryngol, 1985 Apr; 99: 313–7.
Luetje CM, Brackman D, Balkany TJ, et al. Phase III clinical trial results with the Vibrant Soundbridge implantable middle ear hearing device: a prospective controlled multicenter study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002 Feb; 126: 97–107.
Goode RL, Ball G, Nishihara S, Nakamura K. Laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV): a new clinical tool for the otologist. Am J Otol, 1996 Nov; 17: 813–22.
Labassi S, Beliaeff M, Péan V, Van de Heyning P. The Vibrant Soundbridge® middle ear implant: a historical overview. Cochlear Implants Int, 2017; 18: 314–23.
Rahne T. [Physical audiological principles of implantable hearing systems]. HNO, 2019 Nov 8.
Arthur D. The Vibrant® SoundbridgeTM. Trends Amplif, 2002 Jun; 6: 67–72.
Fisch U, Cremers CW, Lenarz T, et al. Clinical experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge implant device. Otol Neurotol, 2001 Nov; 22: 962–72.
Mühlmeier G, Aigner E, Brumma I, Schlegel A, Tisch M. Benefit from an audio processor upgrade in experienced users of an active middle ear implant: speech understanding in noise and subjective assessment. J Hear Sci, 2020 Apr 9; 8: 27–34.
Zimmermann D, Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H. Audiological results with the Samba audio processor in comparison to the Amadé for the Vibrant Soundbridge. Audiol Neurootol, 2020; 25: 164–72.
Rameh C, Meller R, Lavieille J-P, Deveze A, Magnan J. Long-term patient satisfaction with different middle ear hearing implants in sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol, 2010 Aug; 31: 883–92.
Mlynski R, Nguyen TD, Plontke SK, Kösling S. Presentation of floating mass transducer and Vibroplasty couplers on CT and cone beam CT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014 Apr; 271: 665–72.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top