ORIGINAL ARTICLE
COMPUTER-AIDED VOICE PITCH THERAPY IN AURALLY IMPAIRED STUDENTS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Pedagogical University of Cracow, Special Education Institute, Cracow, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Katarzyna Plutecka   

Katarzyna Plutecka, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Special Education Institute, Ingardena 4 Str., 30-060 Cracow, Poland, e-mail: kaplutecka@interia.pl
Publication date: 2020-04-15
 
J Hear Sci 2015;5(3):25–32
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The aim was to measure, evaluate, and improve voice pitch characteristics (measured on the basis of the average fundamental frequency, Fx), in students aged 10–12 who had substantial or severe hearing loss and were fitted with hearing aids. Two core questions were asked: (i) Is therapy using the PCLX Laryngograph Processor effective? (ii) Which factors affect the outcome of therapy?

Material and Methods:
Therapy based on a multimedia computer workstation using the PCLX Laryngograph Processor is proposed, a system capable of visualizing voiced speech using electroglotography. The study is constructed as a pedagogical experiment, using parallel groups and Mill’s method of difference.

Results:
Pretest results show that, prior to therapy sessions, both groups (experimental and control) were largely equivalent with respect to voice pitch characteristics. In total, 49 students exhibited anomalous voice pitch characteristics while 14 cases could be described as unstable (with pitch sometimes correct, but not consistently so). Correlations between concomitant variables and the effectiveness of the therapeutic process were found. In particular, intelligence and visual-motor coordination played a significant role. Variables such as learning speed, working memory capacity, forgetfulness, time since onset of hearing loss, and degree of aural impairment seem to be less important. Improvements appeared to depend on the subject’s family environment and were largely independent of age and degree of hearing loss.

Conclusions:
The research has shown that in most aurally impaired subjects voice pitch is too high and needs to be corrected. The proposed therapy is shown to be highly effective, producing persistent long-term improvements, especially in the case of younger students.

 
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Korzon A, Plutecka K. Kształcenie zintegrowane uczniów niesłyszących w teorii i praktyce edukacyjnej. Oficyna Wydawnicza IMPULS, Kraków, 2010.
 
2.
Zielińska J: Diagnoza i terapia sprawności ortofonicznej dzieci z uszkodzeniem słuchu wspomagane techniką komputerową. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pedagogicznej, Kraków, 2004.
 
3.
Rhoades EA, Chrishom TH. Global language progress with an auditory-verbal therapy approach for children who are deaf or hard of hearing: Volta Review, 2000; 102: 5–25.
 
4.
Blamey PJ, Sarant JZ, Paatsch LE, Barry JG, Bow CP, Wales RJ. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing: Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 2001; 44: 264–85.
 
5.
Tharpe AM, Ashmead DH, Rothpletz AM: Visual attention in children with normal hearing, children with hearing aids, and children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 2002; 45: 403–13.
 
6.
Horn DL, Davis RAO, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT: Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 2005; 26(4): 389–408.
 
7.
Schow RL, Nerbonne MA: Introduction to Audiologic Rehabilitation. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon, 2007.
 
8.
Rochette F, Bigand E. Long-term effects of auditory training in severely or profoundly deaf children. The Neurosciences and Music III: Disorders and Plasticity: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2009; 1169: 195–8.
 
9.
De Raeve L, Anderson I, Bammens M, Jans J, Haesevoets M, Pans R et al. The listening cube: a three dimensional auditory training program. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2012; 5(1): S1–S5.
 
10.
Abberton E, Howard D, Fourcin A: Laryngograph assessment of normal voice: a tutorial. Clinical Linguistic and Fonetics, 1996; 3: 243–59.
 
11.
Fourcin A, Abberton E. Hearing and phonetic criteria in voice measurement: clinical applications. Logoped Phonaitr Vocol, 2008; 33(1): 35–48.
 
12.
Guimaraes, I., Abberton, E: Fundamental frequency in speakers of Portuguese for different voice samples. J Voice, 2005; 19(4): 592–606.
 
13.
Porges SW. Social engagement and attachment: a phylogenetic perspective. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 2003; 1008: 31–47.
 
14.
Porges SW. The polyvagal perspective. Biol Psychol, 2007; 74: 116–43.