CASE STUDY
ELECTRO-NATURAL STIMULATION (ENS) IN PARTIAL DEAFNESS TREATMENT: A CASE STUDY
 
More details
Hide details
1
Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Surgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
2
World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
3
Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department of the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
4
Institute of Sensory Organs, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Piotr Henryk Skarżyński   

Piotr H. Skarżyński, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Str., 02-042 Warsaw, Poland, e-mail: p.skarzynski@inz.waw.pl
Publication date: 2020-04-16
 
J Hear Sci 2014;4(4):67–71
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
There is a significant group of elderly patients whose hearing impairment is characterized by normal or slightly elevated thresholds in the low and mid frequency bands (below 1500 Hz) with nearly total deafness in the high frequency range. These patients very often remain beyond the scope of effective treatment by hearing aids.

Case Report:
This study presents the case of a 75-year-old patient with good hearing in the range 125–1500 Hz and deafness at other frequencies. An implant was used to restore hearing at high frequencies, while preserving low and mid frequency acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. This can be described as electro-natural stimulation (ENS) of the inner ear.

Conclusions:
The results demonstrate that low and mid frequency hearing (up to 1500 Hz) can be preserved using the round window surgical technique. A substantial improvement in speech discrimination was also observed when electrical stimulation on one side was combined with acoustic stimulation on both sides. There is scope to extend qualifying criteria for cochlear implantation to include elderly patients suitable for ENS.

 
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, Bergeron F, Beynon A, Burke E et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurootol, 2012; 18(1): 36–47.
 
2.
Dorman MF, Gifford RH. Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition. Int J Audiol, 2010; 49(12): 912–9.
 
3.
Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Skarżyński H, Lorens A, Polak M, Driscoll CL et al. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear, 2013; 34(4): 413–25.
 
4.
Helbig S, Baumann U, Hey C, Helbig M. Hearing preservation after complete cochlear coverage in cochlear implantation with the free-fitting FLEXSOFT electrode carrier. Otol Neurotol, 2011; 32(6): 973–9.
 
5.
Lorens A, Skarżyński H. Technologia implantów ślimakowych. Nowa Audiofonologia, 2012; 1(3): 18–23.
 
6.
Lorens A, Zgoda M, Skarżyński H. A new audio processor for combined electric and acoustic stimulation for the treatment of partial deafness. Acta Otolaryngol, 2012; 132(7): 739–50.
 
7.
Prentiss S, Sykes K, Staecker H. Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol, 2010; 21(3): 197–203.
 
8.
Skarżyński H, Lorens A, D’Haese P, Walkowiak A, Piotrowska A, Śliwa L et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2002; 64(4): 247–53.
 
9.
Skarżyński H, Lorens A, Matusiak M, Porowski M, Skarżyński PH, James CJ. Partial deafness treatment with the Nucleus straight research array cochlear implant. Audiol Neurootol, 2012; 17(2): 82–91.
 
10.
Van de Heyning P, Adunka O, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brill S et al. Standards of practice in the field of hearing implants. Cochlear Implants Int, 2013; 14(Suppl. 2): 1–5.
 
11.
Collins, JG. Prevalence of selected chronic conditions: United States 1990–1992. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health Statistics, 1997; 10: 194.
 
12.
Mills JH, Schmiedt RA, Dubno JR. Older and wiser, but losing hearing nonetheless. Hear Health, 2006; 12–17.
 
13.
Skarżyński H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A. A new method of partial deafness treatment. Med Sci Monit, 2003; 9(4): CS20–24.
 
14.
Skarżyński H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Anderson I. Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2007; 71: 1407–13.
 
15.
Skarżyński H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Skarżyński PH. Hearing preservation in partial deafness treatment. Med Sci Monit, 2010; 16(11): CR555–62.
 
16.
Skarżyński H, Lorens A. Partial deafness treatment. Cochlear Implant Int, 2010; 11(Suppl 1): 29–41.
 
17.
Skarżyński H, Lorens A, Zgoda M, Piotrowska A, Skarżyński PH, Szkiełkowska A. Atraumatic round window deep insertion of cochlear electrodes. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 2011; 131(7): 740–9.
 
18.
Skarżyński H, Lorens A, Matusiak M, Porowski M, Skarżyński PH, James CJ. Cochlear implantation with the Nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing. Ear Hear, 2014; 35(2): e33–43.
 
19.
Skarżyński H, Matusiak M, Piotrowska A, Skarżyński PH. Surgical techniques in partial deafness treatment. J Hear Sci, 2012; 2(3): 9–13.
 
20.
Skarżyński H. Ten years’ experience with a new strategy of partial deafness treatment. J Hear Sci, 2012; 2(2): 11–18.
 
21.
Skarżyński H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner W et al. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 2013; 133 (Suppl 564): 3–13.
 
22.
Lorens A, Polak M, Piotrowska A, Skarżyński H: Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study. Laryngoscope 2008; 118(2): 288–94.
 
23.
Moran M, Dowell RC, Umansky A, Briggs RJS, Corbett S. Outcomes for patients with sloping hearing loss given standard cochlear implants. J Hear Sci, 2014; 4(3): 9–19.
 
eISSN:2084-3127
ISSN:2083-389X